Eric Hughes’ article, "Evaluating Existing Web Sites and Applications: Consistency," is interesting to me since we’ve just designed our own rubric for evaluating web sites in our last group project. My group didn’t include consistency as a specific criteria in our rubric, and I wish that we had. The criteria that we used for reviewing 20 national news sites were usability, design, content, currency, and interactivity. (To view my group’s evaluation page, click here). On some level, I’m sure that consistency affected our grading; for instance, web sites with a consistent design are generally more aesthetically pleasing, opposed to those that use random colors and fonts on each page. However, I know that I didn’t probe each site in this area - especially for consistency in results, process, and versioning. In fact, I hadn’t even thought of these subcategories prior to this reading.
In all, Hughes lists 11 areas of consistency that one should use when looking at sites. I mentioned consistency in results, process, and versioning earlier, and the others are consistency in: form, language and content, function, coding, labeling, design, error messaging, and in the reason a piece of content exists. I think that each of these are valid categories, but relating to our last project, the category that might have been a little tricky for my group would have been consistency in language and content. Although the news sites that we reviewed definitely have their own tone, there’s a variety of news stories ranging in areas from Politics to Health to Technology. Also, there are a variety of journalists reporting in their unique style, and most news sites have a section dedicated to blogs.
One other point that I find interesting in this article is that people will tell their friends about a bad experience at a restaurant, but they are less likely to tell their friends about a bad experience with a web site because they may not be able to articulate what it is that makes it bad. Therefore, it’s important to pay special attention to consistency on your site, since you may not hear negative feedback from your audience.